-
What Mazur Means for the Court of Protection
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has landed with unusual force across the profession. What began as a discrete costs appeal over a law firm’s use of an employee without a practising certificate has spiralled into a wider crisis of confidence about who, within a regulated… Read more
-
Bargain Wills, Expensive Consequences: The Case for Regulation
A man dies. His partner is left to grieve and discovers that the Will he made online for £19.99 includes a clause she had no idea existed. It names the Will-writing service’s parent company as professional executor and entitles them to 4% of the estate. The company demands nearly £10,000. The house she lived in,… Read more
-
Navigating Direct Payments After Lumb: What Deputies Need to Know
Lumb v NHS Humber and North Yorkshire ICB & Anor [2024] EWCOP 57 has become a lightning rod for scrutiny across Court of Protection practice. At its core, the case raised a deceptively simple question: can a professional deputy act as the recipient of direct payments (DPs) and charge P for related management, without express… Read more
-
Offshore Trusts, UK Tax, and the Valesca Louwman Case: What You Need to Know
Offshore trusts have long been a way for wealthy individuals – especially those who move between countries – to manage their money. But as governments crack down on tax avoidance, the rules around these structures have become far more complicated. One recent case, Valesca Louwman v HM Revenue & Customs ([2025] UKFTT 295 (TC)), shines… Read more